The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1131•Videolabs, Inc. v. Netflix, Inc.
25-1131Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitMay 12, 2026
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
VIDEOLABS, INC.,
Appellant
v.
NETFLIX, INC.,
Appellee
______________________
2025-1131
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-
00628.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
J AIME F. CARDENAS -N AVIA , Reichman Jorgensen Leh-
man & Feldberg LLP, New York, NY, argued for appellant.
Also represented by MICHAEL MATULEWICZ-CROWLEY ,
N ATHANIEL G USTAV WARNER ; BRIAN C. B ARAN, SAVANNAH
H. CARNES , N AVEED S. HASAN, CHRISTINE E. L EHMAN,
Washington, DC.
ALIZA G EORGE C ARRANO, Willkie Farr & Gallagher
LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also
Case: 25-1131 Document: 46 Page: 1 Filed: 05/12/2026
-- 1 of 2 --
represented by D ANE SOWERS ; D EVON WESLEY EDWARDS ,
MATTHEW S. F REIMUTH , New York, NY.
______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (L OURIE, L INN, and HUGHES , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
May 12, 2026
Date
Case: 25-1131 Document: 46 Page: 2 Filed: 05/12/2026
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.