The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
25-1351•Natasha Collins v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Restaurant Revitalization Fund
25-1351Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 22, 2026
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
NATASHA COLLINS,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, Restaurant
Revitalization Fund,
Defendant-Appellee
______________________
2025-1351
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania in No. 2:22-cv-04104-JP,
Judge John R. Padova.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Before LOURIE, CHEN, and STARK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
Natasha Collins filed this suit seeking to compel the
Small Business Administration (SBA) to grant her applica-
tion for economic aid under the Restaurant Revitalization
Fund program. The United States District Court for the
Case: 25-1351 Document: 24 Page: 1 Filed: 04/22/2026
-- 1 of 2 --
COLLINS v. SBA 2
Eastern District of Pennsylvania dismissed her complaint.
She then filed an appeal directed to this court. In response
to our show cause order, the SBA urges dismissal, while
Ms. Collins asks for relief on the merits and moves “for ex-
pedited appeal.” ECF No. 23 at 2.
This court’s jurisdiction to review district court cases is
generally limited to cases involving the patent laws, see
28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on review to the district
court from the United States Patent and Trademark Office,
see id. § 1295(a)(4)(C); and cases involving certain damages
claims against the United States “not exceeding $10,000 in
amount,” id. § 1346(a)(2), see id. § 1295(a)(2). This case
does not fall within that jurisdiction. Lacking jurisdiction,
we deem it appropriate under the circumstances to transfer
this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Third Circuit. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 41, 1291, 1294, 1631.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
The appeal and all its filings are transferred to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit pur-
suant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.
April 22, 2026
Date
FOR THE COURT
Case: 25-1351 Document: 24 Page: 2 Filed: 04/22/2026
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.