Inneos LLC v. Opticis Co., Ltd.

25-1487Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJun 10, 2026

Full text

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
INNEOS LLC,
Appellant
v.
OPTICIS CO., LTD.,
Appellee
______________________
2025-1487
______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark
Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2023-
01256.
______________________
JUDGMENT
______________________
CHRISTIAN E. MAMMEN, Womble Bond Dickinson (US)
LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for appellant. Also repre-
sented by J ULIE G IARDINA, BARRY J. HERMAN, Baltimore,
MD.
MICHAEL J ONES , Rothwell, Figg, Ernst & Manbeck, PC,
Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by
MARTIN MOSS Z OLTICK.
______________________
Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 1 Filed: 06/10/2026

-- 1 of 2 --

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
O RDERED and ADJUDGED:
P ER CURIAM (D YK, MAYER , and P ROST , Circuit
Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY O RDER OF THE COURT
June 10, 2026
Date
Case: 25-1487 Document: 38 Page: 2 Filed: 06/10/2026

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.