JEFF OLLEY, ADERONKE ADEREMI, J. O., a Mi- nor v. SCOTT TURNER, In his capacity as the United States Secretary of Housing

25-2144Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitNov 24, 2025

Full text

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
JEFF OLLEY, ADERONKE ADEREMI, J. O., a Mi-
nor,
Plaintiffs-Appellants
v.
SCOTT TURNER, In his capacity as the United
States Secretary of Housing and Urban Develop-
ment, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, TEXAS WORKFORCE
COMMISSION, (Civil Right Division), BRYAN
DANIEL, In his Capacity as the Commissioner for
the Public, BRYAN D. SNOODY, in his Capacity as
the Civil Right Director, MYRON J. LEWIS, Em-
ployee, Investigator, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS,
TENESHIA HUDSPETH, Harris County Clerk,
AUDRIE LAWTON-EVANS, Harris County Judge,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2025-2144
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas in No. 4:24-cv-04667, Senior
Judge Simeon Timothy Lake, III.
______________________
ON MOTION
______________________
Case: 25-2144 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 11/24/2025

-- 1 of 3 --

OLLEY v. TURNER 2
Before PROST, CHEN, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
O R D E R
In this civil rights case, appellants respond to the
court’s October 14, 2025 show cause order by moving to
transfer the appeal to the United States Court of Appeals
for the Fifth Circuit. Appellants also note that they filed
at the district court a timely, amended notice of appeal di-
rected to the Fifth Circuit.
This court’s jurisdiction to review decisions of federal
district courts is generally limited to final decisions in pa-
tent cases, see 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1); civil actions on re-
view to the district court from the United States Patent and
Trademark Office, see id. § 1295(a)(4)(C); or cases involving
certain damages claims against the United States “not ex-
ceeding $10,000 in amount,” id. § 1346(a)(2), see id.
§ 1295(a)(2). This case does not fall within any of those
limited subject matter areas. Because appellants already
have an appeal proceeding before the Fifth Circuit, Olley v.
Todman, No. 25-20422 (5th Cir. Sept. 24, 2025), granting
the motion to transfer is unnecessary.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
(1) The motion to transfer is denied. The appeal is dis-
missed.
Case: 25-2144 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 11/24/2025

-- 2 of 3 --

OLLEY v. TURNER 3
(2) Each party shall bear its own costs.
November 24, 2025
Date
FOR THE COURT
Case: 25-2144 Document: 6 Page: 3 Filed: 11/24/2025

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.