The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
26-1343•Renzie Wilson Price v. Netflix, Inc., Dennis Liu, Jason Piperberg, Michael B. Jordan, Charles D. King,…
26-1343Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApr 15, 2026
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
RENZIE WILSON PRICE,
Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
NETFLIX, INC., DENNIS LIU, JASON PIPERBERG,
MICHAEL B. JORDAN, CHARLES D. KING, CAROL
BARBEE, KIM ROTH, POPPY HANKS, KENNY
GOODMAN, OUTLIER SOCIETY LLC, MACRO
MEDIA LLC,
Defendants-Appellees
______________________
2026-1343
______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Central District of California in No. 2:22-cv-04568-JAK-
PD, Judge John A. Kronstadt.
______________________
O R D E R
Before DYK, REYNA, and HUGHES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In response to this court’s show cause order, the parties
correctly note that we lack jurisdiction over this copyright
infringement case. See 28 U.S.C. § 1295. While appellees
Case: 26-1343 Document: 11 Page: 1 Filed: 04/15/2026
-- 1 of 2 --
WILSON PRICE v. NETFLIX, INC. 2
urge dismissal, we deem it the better course to transfer to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.1
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED THAT:
This appeal and all case filings are transferred to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
April 15, 2026
Date
FOR THE COURT
1 The court notes that the parties dispute the timeli-
ness of this appeal: Netflix contends this appeal is untimely
because it appears the district court’s clerk’s office received
Mr. Wilson Price’s notice of appeal outside the statutory
time to appeal, while Mr. Wilson Price argues the appeal is
timely because he purports to have emailed a notice of ap-
peal to the district court judge’s chambers within that time,
to which Netflix responds with out-of-circuit case law indi-
cating that such an email is insufficient. Under the cir-
cumstances, we deem it the better course to transfer,
leaving it to the Ninth Circuit to assess the parties’ argu-
ments as to timeliness.
Case: 26-1343 Document: 11 Page: 2 Filed: 04/15/2026
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.