Papst Licensing v. Fujifilm Corporation [errata]

14-1110Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFeb 3, 2015

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
for the Federal Circuit
______________________
February 3, 2015
ERRATA
______________________
Appeal No. 2014-1110
IN RE PAPST LICENSING DIGITAL CAMERA
PATENT LITIGATION
____________________________________________________
PAPST LICENSING GMBH & CO. KG,
v.
FUJIFILM CORPORATION, FUJIFILM NORTH
AMERICA CORPORATION (formerly known as
Fujifilm USA, Inc.), HEWLETT-PACKARD
COMPANY, JVC COMPANY OF AMERICA, NIKON
CORPORATION, NIKON, INC., OLYMPUS CORP.,
OLYMPUS IMAGING AMERICA INC., PANASONIC
CORPORATION (formerly known as Matsushita
Electric Industrial Co., LTD.), PANASONIC
CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA , SAMSUNG
OPTO-ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., SAMSUNG
TECHWIN CO., AND VICTOR COMPANY OF JAPAN,
LTD.,
Decided: February 2, 2015
Precedential Opinion
_____________________

-- 1 of 2 --

PAPST LICENSING V. FUJI FILM CORPORATION 2
Please make the following change:
On page two, replace the sentence
J OHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Hoffman Sigler LLP, of
Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
with the following sentence:
J OHN T. BATTAGLIA, Fisch Sigler LLP, of Washington, DC,
argued for plaintiff-appellant.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.