The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
091043npo-pdf•Nazario Burgos v. Mary Canino
091043npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJun 16, 2009
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 09-1043
_____________
NAZARIO BURGOS,
Appellant
v.
MARY CANINO; MARSHALL, CORRECTION OFFICER;
DAY, LIEUTENANT; LEVI HOSBAND; TONY WOLFE; CUDDEBACK, CORRECTION
OFFICER; DAVID DIGUGLIELMO; CORRETTE, CORRECTION OFFICER; LIEUTENANT
DOYLE; LIEUTENANT SMITH; CORRECTION OFFICER CHO; CORRECTION OFFICER
BARRATA; SCOTT DAVIES
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil No. 2-06-cv-02497)
District Judge: Honorable Anita B. Brody
____________________________________
Submitted for Possible Dismissal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
or Summary Action Pursuant to Third Circuit LAR 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6
June 4, 2009
Before: SLOVITER, FUENTES AND JORDAN, Circuit Judges
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
The opinion issued by this Court on June 15, 2009 has been amended. On page two,
paragraph two the “period” after the word “Pennsylvania” is now a comma and the word
“Burgus” has been removed after the period.
At the direction of the Court, it is hereby O R D E R E D that the Clerk shall file an
amended opinion.
-- 1 of 2 --
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Dated: June 16, 2009
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.