The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
094255npo-pdf•Louis Anthony Manna v. WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ D. NJ No. 09-cv-01185
094255npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitDec 9, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 09-4255
LOUIS ANTHONY MANNA,
Appellant
v.
WARDEN PAUL SCHULTZ
(D. NJ No. 09-cv-01185)
ORDER
On January 8, 2010, the Court issued a Not Precedential opinion in the above entitled
case. When the Court issues an opinion, it is the usual practice to identify the opinion as
either Not Precedential or Precedential in the upper right corner of the opinion. It appears
that the opinion in this matter omitted the customary designation. In addition,
Precedential opinions follow a specific format and style which are not applicable to Not
Precedential opinions and are not present in this opinion.
The opinion for this case was entered on the Court’s docket as a Not Precedential opinion
and appeared on the Not Precedential opinion page of the Court’s website.
It has come to the Clerk’s attention that at least one legal publisher has erroneously
recorded the opinion as a Precedential opinion. This order has been issued to serve notice
that the opinion issued in this case is deemed Not Precedential and therefore is not
binding authority. 3 rd Cir. I.O.P. 5.7.
For the Court,
Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk
Date: December 9, 2011
PSD/cc: Office of the U.S. Attorney New Jersey
Louis Anthony Manna
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.