The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
094477npo-pdf•United States of America v. Steven C. Tanzola
094477npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJun 9, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 09-4477
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
STEVEN C. TANZOLA,
Appellant.
_______________
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
(D.C. Crim. Action No. 08-00724)
District Judge: Honorable Berle M. Schiller
_______________
Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)
December 16, 2010
_______________
ORDER
_______________
The opinion filed on March 7, 2011 shall be amended as follows: at page 4, where
(2) “allow the parties to argue their positions relative to what they believe is an
appropriate sentence;” shall be replaced with (2) “they must formally rule on the motions
of both parties and state on the record whether they are granting a departure and how that
departure affects the Guidelines calculation, and take into account the court’s pre-Booker
case law, which continues to have advisory force.” This does not affect the Judgment
issued by the Court on March 7, 2011. An amended opinion will be filed; however the
original filing date will not be altered.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Joseph A. Greenaway, Jr.
Circuit Judge
Dated: June 9, 2011
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.