The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
101554po-pdf•Mukash Kuma Maneklal Patel v. Attorney General of the United States of America
101554po-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitApr 25, 2011
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
March 16, 2011
No. 10-1554
MUKASH KUMA MANEKLAL PATEL,
Petitioner
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent
(BIA-1: A074-586-999 )
Present: BARRY, HARDIMAN and STAPLETON, Circuit Judges
Motion filed by Respondent Atty Gen USA to publish the opinion filed on
02/24/11.
Respectfully,
Clerk/trg
_________________________________ORDER________________________________
The foregoing Motion is GRANTED. The designation of the opinion in this matter as
precedential does not alter the Court’s previously issued judgment. As such the filing
date of the judgment and the decision remain unchanged.
By the Court,
/s/ Thomas M. Hardiman
Circuit Judge
Dated: April 25, 2011
CJG/cc: Matthew B. George, Esq.
Dawn S. Conrad, Esq.
Harold D. Block, Esq.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.