The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
103552po1-pdf•United States of America v. MICHAEL WRIGHT and RANDALL WRIGHT
103552po1-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitJul 6, 2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
_____________
No. 10-3552
_____________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellant
v.
MICHAEL WRIGHT and
RANDALL WRIGHT
__________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Nos. 5:09-cr-00270-001 & 5:09-cr-00270-002)
District Judge: Honorable Lawrence F. Stengel
Present: McKEE, Chief Judge, SLOVITER, SCIRICA, RENDELL, AMBRO,
FUENTES, SMITH, FISHER, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN,
GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, and ALDISERT, Circuit Judges
ORDER
Upon further consideration, this Court concludes that rehearing en banc is not
necessary in the above-captioned case. Accordingly, the order of this Court, dated July 6,
2012, ordering rehearing en banc is hereby vacated.
By the Court,
/s/ Theodore A. McKee
Chief Circuit Judge
Dated: July 11, 2012
Smw/cc: Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq.
Mark S. Greenberg, Esq.
Michael N. Huff, Esq.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.