Third Circuit disposition — 104790np-pdf

104790np-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitMar 30, 2011

Full text

1
GLD-144 NOT PRECEDENTIAL
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 10-4790
___________
IN RE: NOEL K. BANGO,
Petitioner
____________________________________
On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the
United States District Court for the District of New Jersey
(Related to D.N.J. Civ. No. 10-cv-06180)
____________________________________
Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.
March 24, 2011
Before: AMBRO, CHAGARES and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges
(Opinion filed: March 30, 2011 )
_________
OPINION
_________
PER CURIAM
Pro se petitioner, Noel Bango, has filed a mandamus petition pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1651, wherein he apparently seeks to compel the United States District Court for
the District of New Jersey to rule on a motion for emergency injunctive relief which was
filed on December 28, 2010. Finding no basis for granting mandamus relief, we will
deny the petition.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
From a review of the District Court docket, an order denying the underlying
petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, as well as Bango’s
motion for emergency injunctive relief, was entered by the District Court on January 3,
2011. Accordingly, Bango’s petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the
District Court to dispose of his motion is moot.
To the extent Bango now wishes to challenge the District Court’s disposition of
his § 2241 petition, his motion for emergency injunctive relief, or both, such review is
available in the form of an appeal to this Court. Of course, a notice of appeal from the
District Court’s January 3, 2011 order had to be filed within the time prescribed by Fed.
R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B), i.e., within 60 days of the date of entry of the judgment or order
appealed. If petitioner believes that the appeal period should be extended or reopened, he
should promptly file the appropriate motion in the District Court. See Fed. R. App. P.
4(a)(5) and 4(a)(6).
For the foregoing reason, the petition for a writ of mandamus will be denied.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.