The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
111720npo-pdf•Fred Wilson v. Superintendent of Sci Huntingdon
111720npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitMay 16, 2012
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
__________
No. 11-1720
__________
FRED WILSON, Appellant
v.
SUPERINTENDENT OF SCI HUNTINGDON;
THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA;
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
__________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. No. 2-09-cv-04797)
District Judge: The Honorable John R. Padova
ARGUED April 17, 2012
BEFORE: SCIRICA, AMBRO, and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges
(Opinion Filed May 16, 2012)
__________
ORDER AMENDING OPINION
__________
It is ordered that the opinion in the above case, filed on May 16, 2012, be amended
as follows:
On the first page of the caption, delete “[Argued]” after Adrian N. Roe, Esq.
This amendment does not change the date of filing, May 16, 2012.
By the Court,
Circuit Judge
/s/ Richard L. Nygaard
Dated: 21 May 2012
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.