The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
241057npo-pdf•Adam I. Murse v. MARY L. MURSE On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern…
241057npo-pdfCourt of Appeals for the Third CircuitApr 23, 2024
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
___________
No. 24-1057
___________
ADAM I. MURSE,
Appellant
v.
MARY L. MURSE
____________________________________
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
(D.C. Civil Action No. 5:23-cv-03829)
District Judge: Honorable Jeffrey L. Schmehl
____________________________________
PETITION FOR REHEARING
________________________
BEFORE: CHAGARES, Chief Judge, and JORDAN, HARDIMAN, SHWARTZ,
KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, PORTER, MATEY, PHIPPS, FREEMAN,
MONTGOMERY-REEVES, CHUNG, Circuit Judges
_________
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant in the above-entitled case having
been submitted to the judges who participated in the decision of this Court, it is hereby
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the panel is GRANTED. The Clerk is
directed to file the amended opinion and judgment contemporaneously with this order.
The revisions to the opinion are at pages 2 and 4-5.
The petition for rehearing filed by Appellant also having been submitted to all the
other available circuit judges of the circuit in regular active service and a majority of the
-- 1 of 2 --
2
judges of the circuit in regular service not having voted for rehearing, it is hereby
ORDERED that the petition for rehearing by the Court en banc is DENIED.
BY THE COURT
s/ Paul B. Matey
Circuit Judge
Dated: April 23, 2024
Amr/cc: All counsel of record
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.