United States of America v. Alfredo Simpson

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-6280
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff -Appellee,
versus
ALFREDO SIMPSON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief
District Judge. (CR-90-67-3)
Submitted: May 30, 2002 Decided: June 6, 2002
Before WILKINS, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alfredo Simpson, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant
United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Alfredo Simpson appeals the district court’s orders denying
his “Motion to Vacate Judgement[sic] Under Rule 12(b)(2)” and his
Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and the
district court’s opinions and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Simpson, No. CR-90-67-3 (E.D.N.C. June 26, 2001;
Oct. 16, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --