The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1514•Deborah A. Dooley v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
14-1514Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 17, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1514
DEBORAH A. DOOLEY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
MYLAN INC.; MYLAN BERTEK PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley,
District Judge. (1:13-cv-00001-IMK)
Submitted: October 1, 2014 Decided: December 16, 2014
Amended: December 17, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Deborah A. Dooley, Appellant Pro Se. Larissa Cason Dean, James
A. Walls, Joseph V. Schaeffer, SPILMAN, THOMAS & BATTLE, PLLC,
Morgantown, West Virginia, for Appellee.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Deborah A. Dooley appeals the district court’s orders
and judgment granting summary judgment and dismissing her
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, while we grant Dooley leave to proceed in
forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Dooley v. Mylan Pharm., Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00001-IMK
(N.D.W. Va. Apr. 1, 2014; Apr. 30, 2014). We deny Dooley’s
motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.