The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1829•Anthony Dwayne Hammonds v. Bo’s Food Store
14-1829Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 22, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1829
ANTHONY DWAYNE HAMMONDS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BO’S FOOD STORE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. Louise W. Flanagan,
District Judge. (7:13-cv-00066-FL)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Anthony Dwayne Hammonds, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Joyce
Lehman, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Anthony Dwayne Hammonds appeals the district court’s
order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and denying
relief in his employment discrimination action. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Hammonds v. Bo’s Food Store, No. 7:13-cv-00066-FL (E.D.N.C. July
29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.