The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1883•Kevin Robertson v. United States of America
14-1883Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 26, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1883
KEVIN ROBERTSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee,
and
RICHARD M. KREMEN,
Trustee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. William D. Quarles, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-02553-WDQ)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Robertson, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan D. Carroll, Bruce
R. Ellisen, John Schumann, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE,
Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Robertson appeals the district court’s order
affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his complaint
challenging certain tax collection activities by the Internal
Revenue Service. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Robertson v. United States, No. 1:13-cv-
02553-WDQ (D. Md. July 30, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.