The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-1967•Roger Seawright, of Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall Decor Prints v. M. Shanken Communications, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com
14-1967Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 18, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-1967
ROGER SEAWRIGHT, of Seawright PC Solutions, d/b/a Wall
Decor Prints,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. SHANKEN COMMUNICATIONS, d/b/a Cigaraficionado.com,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-01326-JKB)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roger Seawright, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Zev Herbst, REED
SMITH LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roger Seawright appeals the district court’s orders
dismissing his civil complaint against M. Shanken Communications
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Seawright v. M.
Shanken Comm., No. 1:14-cv-01326-JKB (D. Md. July 3, 2014 &
filed Aug. 26, 2014; entered Aug. 27, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.