The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2011•Eugene T. Holmes, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes v. DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections
14-2011Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 18, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2011
EUGENE T. HOLMES, a/k/a Eugene "Sherlock" Holmes,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAYNA CAUSBY, Director, Board of Elections; DANIEL C.
AYSCUE, President, Alliance Bank & Trust; GREGORY MCINTYRE,
Attorney; TIM MOORE; ROGER WOODARD,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Martin K. Reidinger,
District Judge. (1:14-cv-00241-MR)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 18, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene T. Holmes, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene T. Holmes appeals the district court’s order
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint.
On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the
Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Holmes does
not challenge in his informal brief the basis for the district
court’s disposition but instead appears to raise new claims, he
has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.