Rose McKinley v. Cmh Homes, Inc.

14-2159Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2159
ROSE MCKINLEY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
and
SHAMEARE MCKINLEY; JAMEL MCKINLEY; SHAVONIA MCKINLEY;
DAIJUANNA MCKINLEY; BRITTANY MCKINLEY; SHEREKA MCKINLEY;
KEVIN MCKINLEY,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CMH HOMES, INC.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, Senior District
Judge. (2:11-cv-02982-CWH)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion
Rose McKinley, Appellant Pro Se. Brian Montgomery Barnwell,
Allen Mattison Bogan, NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH, LLP,

-- 1 of 3 --

2
Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Rose McKinley appeals the district court’s order granting
the Defendant’s summary judgment motion and dismissing her civil
negligence suit as untimely under the South Carolina statute of
limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. McKinley v. CMH Homes, Inc., No. 2:11-cv-02982-
CWH (D.S.C. Sept. 25, 2014). We grant McKinley permission to
proceed in forma pauperis. We deny McKinley’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.