Catherine Denise Randolph v. Us Attorney General, et al; NEW TECHNOLOGY

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2193
CATHERINE DENISE RANDOLPH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
US ATTORNEY GENERAL, et al; NEW TECHNOLOGY,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. George L. Russell, III, District Judge.
(1:14-cv—03298-GLR)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Catherine Denise Randolph, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Catherine Denise Randolph appeals the district court’s
order dismissing her complaint as frivolous and for failing to
state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Randolph v. Attorney Gen., No. 1:14-cv-03298-GLR (D. Md. Oct.
30, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
DISMISSED

-- 2 of 2 --