The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2209•Renee Ferebee v. Temple Hills Post Office
14-2209Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 26, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2209
RENEE FEREBEE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TEMPLE HILLS POST OFFICE,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. George Jarrod Hazel, District Judge.
(8:14-cv-02451-GJH)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 26, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Renee Ferebee, Appellant Pro Se. Rod J. Rosenstein, United
States Attorney, Rebecca Ann Koch, Assistant United States
Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Renee Ferebee appeals the district court’s order
dismissing her removed civil action in which Ferebee alleged
that employees at the Temple Hills Post Office tampered with her
mail and treated her with disrespect. On appeal, we confine our
review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th
Cir. R. 34(b). Because Ferebee’s informal brief does not
challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition,
Ferebee has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order.
Thus, although we grant leave to proceed on appeal in forma
pauperis, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.