The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-2356•John S. Stritzinger v. Bank of America; Vernon Wright
14-2356Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 20, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-2356
JOHN S. STRITZINGER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BANK OF AMERICA; VERNON WRIGHT,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Terry L. Wooten, Chief District
Judge. (3:14-cv-02409-TLW)
Submitted: May 18, 2016 Decided: May 20, 2016
Before SHEDD, DIAZ, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John S. Stritzinger, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John S. Stritzinger appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing
his complaint without prejudice for failing to comply with a
court order.* On appeal, we confine our review to the issues
raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
Because Stritzinger’s informal brief does not challenge the
basis for the district court’s disposition, Stritzinger has
forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly,
we grant Stritzinger leave to proceed in forma pauperis, deny
the motion to remand, and affirm the district court’s judgment.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* We conclude that Stritzinger timely filed his notice of
appeal. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.