The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6005•United States of America v. Dave Andrae Taylor, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike
14-6005Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6005
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a
Spike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)
Submitted: April 17, 2014 Decided: April 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Peter Sinclair Duffey,
Gurney Wingate Grant, II, Katherine Lee Martin, Robert E. Trono,
Assistant United States Attorneys, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order
finding that it lacked jurisdiction over Taylor’s motion to
reconsider the denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012)
motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. United States v. Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-
2 (E.D. Va. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.