The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6036•Stephen Mark Hause v. DAYNE PHILLIPS, Assistant Public Defender, in his Individual
14-6036Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 30, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6036
STEPHEN MARK HAUSE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DAYNE PHILLIPS, Assistant Public Defender, in his Individual
and Official Capacities on behalf of the Lexington County
Public Defender’s Office,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(3:13-cv-02743-RMG)
Submitted: April 24, 2014 Decided: April 30, 2014
Before WILKINSON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stephen Mark Hause, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Stephen Mark Hause appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§§ 1915(e)(2)(B), 1915A (2012). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Hause v. Phillips, No.
3:13-cv-02743-RMG (D.S.C. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.