United States of America v. Shawn Dewayne Randle

14-6142Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 29, 2014

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6142
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
SHAWN DEWAYNE RANDLE,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:07-cr-00084-JCT-4)
Submitted: May 19, 2014 Decided: May 29, 2014
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Shawn Dewayne Randle, Appellant Pro Se. Charlene Rene Day,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Shawn Dewayne Randle appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reconsider the denial of his motion
for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Randle, No.
7:07-cr-00084-JCT-4 (W.D. Va. Jan. 14, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.