The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6201•Adrian D. Murray v. Mary Pollard; Danielle M. Carman; Toni Banks; Theodore S. Royster
14-6201Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6201
ADRIAN D. MURRAY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MARY POLLARD; DANIELLE M. CARMAN; TONI BANKS; THEODORE S.
ROYSTER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Frank D. Whitney,
Chief District Judge. (1:13-cv-00314-FDW)
Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian D. Murray, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian D. Murray appeals the district court’s order
dismissing after a 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (2012) review his 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983 (2012) complaint, and its order denying his Fed. R. Civ.
P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration and motion to amend the
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders.
Murray v. Pollard, No. 1:13-cv-00314-FDW (W.D.N.C. Jan. 7, 2014;
Jan. 24, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.