The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6236•United States of America v. Albert F. Iaquinta
14-6236Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitAug 15, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6236
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Petitioner – Appellee,
v.
ALBERT F. IAQUINTA,
Respondent - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior
District Judge. (5:98-hc-00764-BR)
Submitted: July 31, 2014 Decided: August 15, 2014
Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James B. Craven, III, Durham, North Carolina, for Appellant.
Thomas G. Walker, United States Attorney, R.A. Renfer, Jr.,
Robert J. Dodson, Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Albert F. Iaquinta appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a hearing pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A.
§ 4247(h) (West 2012 & Supp. 2014) to determine whether he
should be discharged. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.