The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6292•United States of America v. Matthew Davis
14-6292Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 1, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6292
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW DAVIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle
District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr.,
District Judge. (6:95-cr-00284-JAB-1)
Submitted: June 26, 2014 Decided: July 1, 2014
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Clifton Thomas Barrett, Angela
Hewlett Miller, Assistant United States Attorneys, Greensboro,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Davis appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012).* We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United
States v. Davis, No. 6:95-cr-00284-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 27,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
* Although the district court granted Davis’ § 3582(c)(2)
motion, the reduction granted by the court did not reduce Davis’
sentence to the full extent he requested.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.