The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6306•Tony L. Moore v. Anthony J. Padula; Ms. Bell; Keith McBride; L. Greer
14-6306Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 25, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6306
TONY L. MOORE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ANTHONY J. PADULA; MS. BELL; KEITH MCBRIDE; L. GREER,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge.
(5:11-cv-01033-TMC)
Submitted: June 12, 2014 Decided: June 25, 2014
Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tony L. Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Michael Pruitt,
MCDONALD, PATRICK, POSTON, HEMPHILL & ROPER, LLC, Greenwood,
South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tony L. Moore appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we deny Moore’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Moore v. Padula, No.
5:11-cv-01033-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.