The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6359•Robert G. Moore v. United States of America
14-6359Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6359
ROBERT G. MOORE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; UNITED STATES FEDERAL INC.; KELLY
MADIGAN; GRANT MCDANIEL; JUDGE EMANUEL BROWN; JUDGE MARCUS
Z. SHAR; LAWRENCE ROSENBERG; JAMES SCOTT; OTHER TWO LAWYERS
UNKNOWN,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00375-JKB)
Submitted: May 29, 2014 Decided: June 3, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert G. Moore, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert G. Moore appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his “maritime tort claim” without prejudice. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Moore v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-00375-JKB (D. Md. Feb. 14,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.