The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6527•United States of America v. Robert Tomone Neblett
14-6527Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 29, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6527
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROBERT TOMONE NEBLETT,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District
Judge. (3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert Tomone Neblett, Appellant Pro Se. Jessica D. Aber,
OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Angela Mastandrea-Miller,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Robert Tomone Neblett appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b) motion for reduction of
sentence based on substantial assistance. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Neblett, No. 3:09-cr-00301-HEH-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 25, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.