The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6541•Cedeal T. Harper v. Captain James Mccloud, individually
14-6541Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6541
CEDEAL T. HARPER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CAPTAIN JAMES MCCLOUD, individually and in their official
capacities; DAVID BALLARD, Warden; JIM RUBENSTEIN,
Commissioner,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Thomas E. Johnston,
District Judge. (2:12-cv-00656)
Submitted: June 19, 2014 Decided: June 23, 2014
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Cedeal T. Harper, Appellant Pro Se. John P. Fuller, Suleiman O.
Oko-ogua, BAILEY & WYANT, PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Cedeal T. Harper appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Harper v. McCloud, No. 2:12-cv-00656 (S.D.W. Va. Mar.
21, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.