The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-6688•Roderick English v. Fazal Khan
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-6688
RODERICK ENGLISH,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
FAZAL KHAN; RICHARD S. JOHNSON; LPN MICHELLE D. FOX; SYLVIA
ROBERTS; AMORET FLOYD; JOANN BOARDS; ADRIENNE N. LOGAN;
TERRIE LEONARD; RN POWELL; EILEEN DELANY; DONNA LO’DANIEL;
T. BENJAMIN ARTHUR E. MCLAMB; ANN M. DWYER; PRAVIN R.
PATEL,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (1:13-cv-02857-JFA)
Submitted: July 24, 2014 Decided: July 29, 2014
Before FLOYD and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roderick Jerome English, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roderick Jerome English appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. English v. Khan, 1:13-cv-02857-JFA (D.S.C. Apr. 1,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.