The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7110•Kevin Jackson v. RICK FOXWELL, Warden; MARTIN O’MALLEY; GARY D. MAYNARD; HOWARD RAY, JR.
14-7110Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 6, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7110
KEVIN JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
and
EMERY FLOREZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
RICK FOXWELL, Warden; MARTIN O’MALLEY; GARY D. MAYNARD;
HOWARD RAY, JR.,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:13-cv-02450-RDB)
Submitted: December 31, 2014 Decided: January 6, 2015
Before KING, SHEDD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kevin Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Tamal Ajani Banton, Assistant
Attorney General, Pikesville, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kevin Jackson appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Jackson v. Foxwell, No. 1:13-cv-02450-RDB (D. Md. July
17, 2014). We deny Jackson’s motions for appropriate relief, to
strike Appellees’ informal brief, and for appointment of
counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.