The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7161•Ryan Stillman Lucas v. Gary L. Shively; Patrick Lamb
14-7161Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 5, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7161
RYAN STILLMAN LUCAS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GARY L. SHIVELY; PATRICK LAMB,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Michael F. Urbanski, District
Judge. (7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB)
Submitted: February 27, 2015 Decided: March 5, 2015
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John P. Fishwick, Jr., LICHTENSTEINFISHWICK, PLC, Roanoke,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jeremy E. Carroll, GLENN, FELDMANN,
DARBY & GOODLATTE, Roanoke, Virginia; Jim H. Guynn, Jr., GUYNN &
DILLON, P.C., Salem, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ryan Stillman Lucas appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Appellees on Lucas’ 42
U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) and state law claims for false arrest,
false imprisonment, and malicious prosecution. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Shively, No. 7:13-cv-00055-MFU-RSB (W.D. Va. July 7, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.