The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7164•Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr. v. Officer Flanary; Officer Logsden
14-7164Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 3, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7164
MAURICE BERNARD STEWART, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER FLANARY; OFFICER LOGSDEN,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
NORMAN A. BROWN, M.D.; ELIZABETH, R.N.,
Defendants,
and
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:10-cv-00863-JFM)
Submitted: February 19, 2015 Decided: February 24, 2015
Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON,
Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie
Judith Lane-Weber, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr. appeals the district court’s
order granting summary judgment to the Appellees. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See
Stewart v. Flanary, No. 1:10-cv-00863-JFM (D. Md. July 25,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.