Full text
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7309
CLARENCE HICKS,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-02103-ELH)
Submitted: February 25, 2015 Decided: March 3, 2015
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Hicks, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Hicks appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his motion filed under the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C.
§ 1657 (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in
forma pauperis and we dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated
by the district court. Hicks v. United States, No. 1:14-cv-
02103-ELH (D. Md. July 11, 2014). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
