The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7330•Raymond Edward Chestnut v. Michael E. Suggs; Jimmy A. Richardson, Ii; John L. Breeden; Chad Mullinix
14-7330Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7330
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MICHAEL E. SUGGS; JIMMY A. RICHARDSON, II; JOHN L. BREEDEN;
CHAD MULLINIX,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 14-7331
RAYMOND EDWARD CHESTNUT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JIMMY MIKE LYLES, Deputy Sheriff; MYRTLE BEACH POLICE
DEPARTMENT; HORRY COUNTY SOLICITOR’S OFFICE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District
of South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District
Judge. (4:12-cv-00913-RBH; 4:12-cv-00914-RBH)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Raymond Edward Chestnut, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Raymond Edward Chestnut appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motions to reduce the amount of funds
withdrawn from his prison trust account pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.