The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7341•Michael D. Goins, a/k/a Michael Goins v. Lieutenant Horne, in his individual
14-7341Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 6, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7341
MICHAEL D. GOINS, a/k/a Michael Goins,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
LIEUTENANT HORNE, in his individual and official capacity;
CORPORAL BYRD, in his individual and official capacity;
OFFICER SEWELL, in his individual and official capacity;
OFFICER LINDSEY, in his individual and official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Richard M. Gergel, District Judge.
(4:13-cv-01269-RMG)
Submitted: January 23, 2015 Decided: February 6, 2015
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael D. Goins, Appellant Pro Se. James Victor McDade, DOYLE,
O’ROURKE, TATE & MCDADE, PA, Anderson, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael D. Goins appeals the district court’s order
substantially accepting the recommendation of the magistrate
judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012)
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Goins v. Horne, No. 4:13-cv-01269-RMG (D.S.C.
Aug. 29, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.