The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7367•Bernard McFadden v. MR. WESTLEY, Officer of Kirkland’s Law Library
14-7367Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7367
BERNARD MCFADDEN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. WESTLEY, Officer of Kirkland’s Law Library; CHRISTOPHER
FLORIAN, SCDC Staff Attorney; DIANE HINGLE, SCDC State
Classification Officer; CANDI L. CANNON, SCDC State
Classification Officer; MRS. YORK, Kershaw Institutional
Classification Officer; MR. EURY, FNU Kershaw Institutional
Classification Officer; MRS. AMASON,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
MARGARET SULLIVAN, 3d Circuit Court Reporter; MARY WILLIAMS,
SC Assistant Attorney General; CHARLES T. BROOKS, Court
Appointed PCR Attorney; MS. HOUGH, Grievance Coordinator of
Kershaw CI; MS. REYNOLDS, Warden of Kershaw, in their
individual or personal capacities,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Rock Hill. J. Michelle Childs, District
Judge. (0:12-cv-02392-JMC)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bernard McFadden, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
McFadden v. Westley, No. 0:12-cv-02392-JMC (D.S.C. Aug. 19,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.