The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7391•United States of America v. Bruce Lee Richardson, a/k/a Chino
14-7391Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 19, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7391
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRUCE LEE RICHARDSON, a/k/a Chino,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Bryson City. Martin K.
Reidinger, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00010-MR-DLH-1)
Submitted: December 16, 2014 Decided: December 19, 2014
Before DUNCAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Bruce Lee Richardson, Appellant Pro Se. Donald David Gast,
Assistant United States Attorney. Asheville, North Carolina, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Bruce Lee Richardson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reopen. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Richardson, No. 2:06-cr-00010-MR-DLH-1 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 5, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.