The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7394•Roylin Junius Beale v. Deputy J. P. Madigan; Officer R. Blow; Officer Harless; Officer Peele; Officer Corprew
14-7394Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7394
ROYLIN JUNIUS BEALE,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
DEPUTY J. P. MADIGAN; OFFICER R. BLOW; OFFICER HARLESS;
OFFICER PEELE; OFFICER CORPREW,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
CAPTAIN PHILLIPS,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:11-ct-03244-F)
Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 23, 2014
Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roylin Junius Beale, Appellant Pro Se. Scott Christopher Hart,
SUMRELL, SUGG, CARMICHAEL, HICKS & HART, PA, New Bern, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Certiorari Granted by Supreme Court, October 5, 2015
Vacated and Remanded by Supreme Court, October 5, 2015
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roylin Junius Beale appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Beale v. Madigan, No. 5:11-ct-03244-F (E.D.N.C. Aug. 27,
2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.