The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7395•United States of America v. George Cornelius Day, a/k/a Corn
14-7395Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 18, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7395
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
GEORGE CORNELIUS DAY, a/k/a Corn,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00460-AJT-1)
Submitted: February 12, 2015 Decided: February 18, 2015
Before MOTZ, WYNN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George Cornelius Day, Appellant Pro Se. LeDora Knight, Neil
Harvey MacBride, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
George Cornelius Day appeals the district court’s
order granting in part and denying in part his motion to correct
clerical error. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Day, No. 1:05-cr-00460-
AJT-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 19, 2014). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.