The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7437•Michael Chew v. KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; JAMES TICHNELL
14-7437Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7437
MICHAEL CHEW,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
KATHLEEN GREEN, Warden; JAMES TICHNELL,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
PAUL WISENGOFF; GREGORY BIRCH; BRUCE BOZMAN; DENISE
GELSINGER; SCOTT ROWE, Correctional Case Management
Specialist; HAMILTON, Gang Intel,
Defendants,
v.
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Party-in-Interest.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, Senior District
Judge. (8:13-cv-02115-DKC)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Michael Chew, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE
OT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Michael Chew appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we deny Chew’s motion for appointment of counsel
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chew
v. Gatewood, No. 8:13-cv-02115-DKC (D. Md. Sept. 2, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.