David E. Hill v. HARVIE WILKINSON, Chief Judge

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7500
DAVID E. HILL,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
HARVIE WILKINSON, Chief Judge; PAUL V. NIEMEYER, U.S.
Circuit Judge; MICHAEL, U.S. Circuit Judge; WIDENER, U.S.
Circuit Judge; DIANA G. MOTZ, U.S. Circuit Judge; ROBERT B.
KING, U.S. Circuit Judge; DENNIS W. SHEDD, U.S. Circuit
Judge; T. S. ELLIS, III, U.S. District Judge; CLAUDE M.
HILTON, U.S. District Judge,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Raymond A. Jackson, District
Judge. (2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-DEM)
Submitted: February 18, 2015 Decided: February 24, 2015
Before KEENAN, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
David E. Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
David E. Hill appeals the district court’s order dismissing
his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action without prejudice, and
the court’s subsequent order denying Hill’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion to alter or amend that judgment and to amend his
complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. See Hill v. Wilkinson, No. 2:13-cv-00127-RAJ-
DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2014 & Sept. 22, 2014). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --