The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7531•Hassaan Haakim Rashaad v. United States of America
14-7531Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 27, 2015
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7531
HASSAAN HAAKIM RASHAAD,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Max O. Cogburn, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:14-cv-00304-MOC)
Submitted: January 22, 2015 Decided: January 27, 2015
Before SHEDD, KEENAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, Appellant Pro Se. William Michael
Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Hassaan Haakim Rashaad, a federal prisoner, appeals
the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Rashaad leave
to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Rashaad v. United
States, No. 3:14-cv-00304-MOC (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 2014). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.