The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-7543•United States of America v. Jeffrey R. Macdonald
14-7543Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 31, 2016
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7543
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JEFFREY R. MACDONALD,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (3:75-cr-00026-F-1)
Submitted: March 22, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jeffrey R. MacDonald, Appellant Pro Se. John Stuart Bruce,
Acting United States Attorney, Leslie Katherine Cooley, Jennifer
P. May-Parker, Assistant United States Attorneys, Brian Michael
Murtagh, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jeffrey R. MacDonald appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for additional DNA testing pursuant to the
Innocence Protection Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 3600 to 3600A (2012). We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. MacDonald, No. 3:75-cr-00026-F-1
(E.D.N.C. Aug. 8, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.