Frank Michael Neff v. Sergeant Steven

14-7548Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 19, 2015

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 14-7548
FRANK MICHAEL NEFF,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT STEVEN; CHAPLAIN HANCOCK; WARDEN; SERGEANT GATES;
SERGEANT HAASI; LIEUTENANT ELLIOTT,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
PRISON,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:14-cv-00718-RDB)
Submitted: March 17, 2015 Decided: March 19, 2015
Before WILKINSON and KING, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frank M. Neff, Appellant Pro Se. Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber,
Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Frank Michael Neff appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Neff v. Steven, No. 1:14-cv-00718-RDB (D. Md. Oct. 10,
2014). We deny Neff’s motion in which he requests that the
court not dismiss his case, and we dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before this court and argument would not aid
the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.